TSTP Solution File: ALG248^2 by Nitpick---2016
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Nitpick---2016
% Problem : ALG248^2 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% Computer : n126.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Jan 17 11:28:34 EST 2017
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 22.97s
% Output : FiniteModel 22.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ALG248^2 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n126.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 15:31:18 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 22.97/9.65 Nitpicking formula...
% 22.97/9.65 Timestamp: 15:31:27
% 22.97/9.65 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 22.97/9.65 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 22.97/9.65 Skipping 5000 scopes. (Consider using "mono" or "merge_type_vars" to prevent
% 22.97/9.65 this.)
% 22.97/9.65 Batch 1 of 1000: Trying 5 scopes:
% 22.97/9.65 card bnd_term = 1 and card bnd_subst = 1
% 22.97/9.65 card bnd_term = 1 and card bnd_subst = 2
% 22.97/9.65 card bnd_term = 2 and card bnd_subst = 1
% 22.97/9.65 card bnd_term = 2 and card bnd_subst = 2
% 22.97/9.65 card bnd_term = 1 and card bnd_subst = 3
% 22.97/9.65 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 22.97/9.65 Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_term = 1 and card bnd_subst = 1:
% 22.97/9.65
% 22.97/9.65 Skolem constants:
% 22.97/9.65 ??.bnd_pushprop_lem1.A = b1
% 22.97/9.65 ??.bnd_pushprop_lem1.B = b1
% 22.97/9.65 ??.bnd_pushprop_lem1.K = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False)
% 22.97/9.65 ??.bnd_pushprop_lem1.M = b1
% 22.97/9.65 ??.bnd_pushprop_lem1.P = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True)
% 22.97/9.65 Constants:
% 22.97/9.65 bnd_comp = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1))
% 22.97/9.65 bnd_one = b1
% 22.97/9.65 bnd_push = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1))
% 22.97/9.65 bnd_sh = b1
% 22.97/9.65 bnd_sub = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1))
% 22.97/9.65 bnd_var = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False)
% 22.97/9.65 % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 22.97/9.65 Total time: 568 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------